Screen any India counterparty for legal risk in one call.
Court record search, FIR signal lookup, sanctions, PEP, adverse media — chained into one legal-risk decisioning call on individuals or entities. Built for legal, compliance, and M&A teams.
One Workflow, Every Legal-Risk Screen
Counterparty diligence, customer onboarding screen, M&A target review, partner contracting, regulator filing — the legal-risk decision chain is the same shape. Configurable per use-case.
Three reasons legal teams collapse risk screening into one call.
Legal-risk screening in India breaks across three axes — coverage of fragmented court systems, speed (especially for M&A windows), and defendable audit. Deepvue's screening chain is built around all three, configurable per use-case.
Indian court systems are fragmented across Supreme Court, High Courts, district courts, tribunals. Manual searches miss. One unified search returns matches across all of them.
External counsel diligence takes weeks. M&A timelines and contract windows don't wait. Parallel API screens return verdicts in minutes — defendable, with citations.
Legal-risk screens need to be defensible. Every match cites case number, court, date. Every clear is timestamped against source. Audit-ready for board, regulator, or counterparty challenge.
External counsel diligence is slow and expensive; ad-hoc court searches miss tribunals; sanctions screening is a separate vendor; adverse media is another. Deepvue collapses all of these into one screening call with citations.
Why ad-hoc legal-risk screening misses signals.
If your funnel is leaking 25%+ between "Apply" and "Approved" — or your audit team is rebuilding decision history from logs — here's where the breakage usually starts.
The screening chain — six primitives, one call.
Every primitive a legal-risk screen needs, wired to call in parallel — configurable per use-case.
How the screening chain runs.
From a name + identifier to a defendable risk verdict with citations — a typical screening cycle.
End-to-end median: under a minute for sync sources, async webhooks for slow court systems. 15-min walkthrough comparison available.
A legal-risk screening call, end-to-end.
What a single legal-risk screen looks like — parallel sources, structured citations, replayable trace.
// Parallel + async, citations attached 1. POST /v1/legal/court-record-search 2. POST /v1/legal/fir-signal 3. POST /v1/screening/sanctions 4. POST /v1/screening/pep 5. POST /v1/screening/adverse-media 6. POST /v1/business/mca-charges 7. POST /v1/decision/legal-risk
{
"subject_id": "sub_8a4f2b9e",
"verdict": "CLEAR",
"sources": {
"court_records": "NO_MATCH",
"fir_signal": "NO_MATCH",
"sanctions": "NO_MATCH",
"pep": "NO_MATCH",
"adverse_media": "NO_MATCH",
"mca_charges": "NO_MATCH"
},
"trace_id": "trc_2026_04_29_17_42",
"compliance_format": "DPDP_v2",
"data_residency": "IN"
} Compliance map for legal risk screening.
The frameworks legal-risk screens get challenged on — DPDP, sanctions, AML, sectoral KYC — and which Deepvue capabilities map to each.
Where legal-risk screens miss signals — and where Deepvue catches them.
From submitted name to risk verdict — the missed signal usually fits one of these five patterns.
Wire it in over a coffee.
Most legal + compliance teams drop the Deepvue screening chain into their workflow in under a week. One sandbox key, one chained endpoint, webhooks back to your CRM / contracting system.
What you get out of the box.
Capabilities every legal-risk screen needs — without coordinating outside counsel and three separate screening vendors.
One workflow, five legal-risk contexts.
Five use-case configurations — same chain, different thresholds and source weighting per context.
Built to defend every screening verdict.
DPDP, sanctions enforcement, AML, sectoral KYC, contractual representations — overlapping audit needs. Deepvue's per-screen citation + trail satisfies all of them.
Deepvue is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Legal and compliance teams retain full responsibility for risk-acceptance decisions. Deepvue provides structured signals + citations; the legal interpretation and decision is yours.
All API interactions are protected using encryption, role-based access controls, and audit logging.
Volume pricing per screen.
Screening bundles tier with monthly screen volume. Pay per chained screen, not per individual source. INR-first invoicing.
Most legal + compliance teams running 100-50k screens per month land in a per-screen range materially under outside-counsel + multi-vendor stitching. No per-source surcharges.
Common questions from compliance and product leads.
Real questions, asked in evaluation calls. If yours isn't here, book a 15-min walkthrough — we'll answer it live.
We use external counsel for diligence. Why move to an API?
How comprehensive is the court-record coverage?
Can we screen entities + their directors in one call?
Where is screening data stored?
Are findings legally defendable?
How long does integration take?
How does Deepvue's "Screen for legal risk" workflow compare to outside-counsel diligence?
Deepvue's legal-risk screening chain runs unified court record search (Supreme + High + district + NCLT/DRT/tribunals), FIR signal lookup, UN/OFAC/EU sanctions, PEP database, multilingual adverse media, and MCA charges + entity status in one parallel API call — with citations on every match. External counsel diligence cycles take weeks; this returns a sub-minute structured verdict that legal teams use to seed counsel review or directly clear/flag counterparties. Configurable per use-case: counterparty, M&A, customer onboarding, partner, regulator filing.
Screen any India counterparty in
under a minute.
Court + sanctions + media + entity registry. Citations on every match.