Vet an Indian vendor before the first PO ships.
PAN, GST, CIN, MCA, Udyam, bank ownership, court record + FIR signals — chained into one due-diligence call. Built for procurement, finance, and supplier-onboarding teams.
One Workflow, Every Vendor Due Diligence Need
Whether you're vetting an SME supplier, a B2B partner, a contract manufacturer, or a services vendor — the due-diligence chain is the same shape. Deepvue gives you that chain as a single API call, configurable per category.
Three reasons teams collapse vendor due diligence into one call.
Vendor vetting breaks across three predictable axes — speed, depth of signal, and audit. Deepvue's due-diligence chain is built around all three, with per-category configuration baked in.
Procurement waits days for verification turnaround. Sub-20-second parallel KYB chains collapse that into a single approval cycle.
Inactive GSTINs, dissolved entities, directors with court history, sanctions hits — each leaves a signature in a registry your KYB stack should be querying.
When finance asks "did we verify this vendor's GST" or audit asks "show the due-diligence on this PO," you have a timestamped trail per vendor — not a buried email thread.
Most procurement teams stitch together 3-5 separate vendors for PAN, GST, MCA, court records, and bank verification. Deepvue collapses that into one due-diligence chain. One contract, one SLA, one audit trail.
Why hand-stitched vendor due diligence breaks down at scale.
If procurement is waiting days for verification turnarounds — or finance keeps discovering inactive GSTINs after the PO — here's where the breakage usually starts.
The KYB chain — six primitives, one call.
Every primitive a vendor-due-diligence chain needs, wired to call in parallel or sequentially. Configure per category.
How the due-diligence chain runs.
From a vendor submitting their PAN to a procurement-approved decision — a typical due-diligence cycle.
End-to-end median: under 20 seconds. Compare against your current vendor verification flow side-by-side in a 15-min walkthrough.
A vendor-vetting decision, end-to-end.
What a single vendor due-diligence call looks like — parallel KYB checks, structured response, full audit trail.
// Parallel by default, stop-on-fail optional 1. POST /v1/identity/pan-validate 2. POST /v1/business/gst-validate 3. POST /v1/business/cin-lookup 4. POST /v1/business/udyam 5. POST /v1/banking/penny-drop 6. POST /v1/bgv/court-record-search 7. POST /v1/decision/vendor-vet
{
"vendor_id": "vn_8a4f2b9e",
"decision": "APPROVED",
"latency_ms": 18412,
"checks": {
"pan_validate": "PASS",
"gstin_active": "REGULAR",
"cin_active": "PASS",
"bank_ownership": "NAME_MATCH",
"director_court": "NO_MATCH",
"sanctions": "NO_MATCH"
},
"audit_trail_id": "at_2026_04_29_17_42_19",
"compliance_format": "DPDP_v2",
"data_residency": "IN"
} Compliance map for vendor due diligence.
The frameworks procurement and finance teams get challenged on when vetting Indian vendors — and which Deepvue capabilities map to each.
Where vendor vetting breaks down — and where Deepvue plugs the holes.
From "PAN submitted" to "PO approved" — vendor vetting usually breaks in one of these five places.
Wire it in over a coffee.
Most teams drop the Deepvue due-diligence chain into their procurement flow in under a week. One sandbox key, one chained endpoint, webhooks back to your existing procurement / ERP system.
What you get out of the box.
Capabilities every vendor-vetting chain needs — without stitching together five vendors.
One workflow, configured per vendor category.
Five vendor configurations — same chain, different thresholds and primitive selection per category.
Built for the audit posture of vendor due diligence.
DPDP, GST input-credit risk, MCA filings, sectoral licences, sanctions — overlapping requirements across procurement and finance. Deepvue's audit trail satisfies all of them out of the box.
Deepvue is not a regulator and does not represent itself as RBI, SEBI, UIDAI, MCA, or any government authority. Buyers retain full responsibility for their procurement decisions and contractual posture. Deepvue provides the verification infrastructure and structured audit trail; the procurement decisioning is yours.
All API interactions are protected using encryption, role-based access controls, and audit logging.
Volume pricing per vendor decision.
KYB bundles tier with monthly vendor volume. Pay per chained decision, not per individual API call. INR-first invoicing.
Most procurement teams running 1k-100k vendor decisions per month land in a per-decision range that comfortably preserves unit economics — no per-source surcharges.
Common questions from compliance and product leads.
Real questions, asked in evaluation calls. If yours isn't here, book a 15-min walkthrough — we'll answer it live.
We already have a KYB vendor and pull court records separately. Why consolidate?
Can we configure the chain per vendor category?
Do you re-verify vendors periodically, or only at signup?
Where is vendor data stored?
Does the audit trail support GST input-credit defence?
How long does integration take?
How does Deepvue's "Vet a vendor" workflow compare to stitching KYB + court-records vendors?
Deepvue's vendor-vetting workflow chains PAN + GST + CIN + MCA + Udyam validation, bank ownership match, director-level court record + FIR signals, sanctions + PEP screening, and a DPDP-aligned per-vendor audit trail into a single API decision call. Most procurement teams replace 3-5 separate vendors (KYB, court records, bank verification, sanctions screening) with this one chain — sub-20-second median, parallel calls instead of sequential, single audit trail. Configurable per vendor category, with periodic GSTIN status and director-change re-verification baked in.
Vet your next vendor in
under 20 seconds.
India-Stack-native. DPDP-aligned. One workflow, every vendor category.